• Project “Zuck Bucks”: Meta plans virtual coin after cryptocurrency flop | Ars Technica
    https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/04/project-zuck-bucks-meta-plans-virtual-coin-after-cryptocurrency-flop

    Meta has drawn up plans to introduce virtual coins, tokens, and lending services to its apps, as Facebook’s parent company pursues its finance ambitions despite the collapse of a project to launch a cryptocurrency.

    The company, led by chief executive Mark Zuckerberg, is seeking alternative revenue streams and new features that can attract and retain users, as popularity falls for its main social networking products such as Facebook and Instagram—a trend that threatens its $118 billion-a-year ad-based business model.

    Facebook’s financial arm, Meta Financial Technologies, has been exploring the creation of a virtual currency for the metaverse, which employees internally have dubbed “Zuck Bucks,” according to several people familiar with the efforts.

    This is unlikely to be a cryptocurrency based on the blockchain, some of the people said. Instead, Meta is leaning toward introducing in-app tokens that would be centrally controlled by the company, similar to those used in gaming apps such as the robux currency in the popular children’s game Roblox.

    According to company memos and people close to the plans, Meta is also looking into the creation of “social tokens” or “reputation tokens,” which could be issued as rewards for meaningful contributions in Facebook groups, for example. Another effort is to make “creator coins” that might be associated with particular influencers on its photo-sharing app Instagram.

    According to one memo shared internally last week, Meta plans to launch a pilot for posting and sharing NFTs on Facebook in mid-May. This will be “quickly followed” by testing of a feature that will allow membership of Facebook groups based on NFT ownership and another for minting—a term for creating—NFTs.

    But the push has been plagued by setbacks and regulatory scrutiny. Earlier this year, the global cryptocurrency project that it spearheaded, diem, was wound down and its assets sold to Californian bank Silvergate, after US regulators refused to give the pilot the green light over monetary stability and competition concerns.

    Amid internal frustrations, Meta’s financial division has suffered what one former employee described as a “mass exodus” of staff over the past six months. Its head David Marcus left at the end of last year, along with key engineers, compliance staff, and nearly its entire legal team.

    Those who remain are looking into how to create or support digital currencies in its metaverse—an avatar-filled virtual world that Zuckerberg hopes will eventually generate billions of dollars in commerce for digital goods and services.

    The new plans represent a far cry from diem and the dream of creating a cryptocurrency. Staffers are now trying to find the least regulated way to offer a digital currency, two people said, with a digital token that is not based on the blockchain emerging as the most attractive option.

    It would not be the first time Facebook has introduced such a currency to its ecosystem. It launched Facebook Credits in 2009, a virtual currency that enabled users to make in-app purchases, typically in games such as FarmVille. This represented 16 percent of revenues at the time of its initial public offering in 2012, according to Barclays, but was shut down in 2013 because it was too costly to maintain.

    Where some of Meta’s efforts are focused on digital payments, other efforts are part of broader plans to use blockchain technology to introduce more “decentralization” across its platforms, amid a growing buzz in Silicon Valley around the so-called Web3 movement.

    Web3 advocates typically seek to wield distributed ledger technology to allow users more control and ownership over their data and disintermediate big tech groups that typically monetize that data as part of their ad-based business models.

    But Meta appears to be embracing some Web3 ideals. It is exploring whether to store data on a blockchain, how it might give users more control over their digital identity and whether their identity or accounts can be transferred to, or used across, other platforms beyond Meta’s apps, according to one planning document.

    Meanwhile, its plans to reward users for credible content with social tokens might allow Meta to remove itself as a central content moderator and give Facebook communities more power in moderating themselves, according to the document.

    #Facebook #NFT #Meta #Monnaie_numérique #Fintech #Web3

  • Khrys’presso du lundi 4 avril 2022
    https://framablog.org/2022/04/04/khryspresso-du-lundi-4-avril-2022

    Comme chaque lundi, un coup d’œil dans le rétroviseur pour découvrir les informations que vous avez peut-être ratées la semaine dernière. Tous les liens listés ci-dessous sont a priori accessibles librement. Si ce n’est pas le cas, pensez à activer … Lire la suite­­

    #Claviers_invités #Internet_et_société #Libr'en_Vrac #Libre_Veille #Non_classé #GAFAM #Internet #Revue_de_web #Revue_hebdo #Surveillance #veille #webrevue

  • Khrys’presso du lundi 28 mars 2022
    https://framablog.org/2022/03/28/khryspresso-du-lundi-28-mars-2022

    Comme chaque lundi, un coup d’œil dans le rétroviseur pour découvrir les informations que vous avez peut-être ratées la semaine dernière. Tous les liens listés ci-dessous sont a priori accessibles librement. Si ce n’est pas le cas, pensez à activer … Lire la suite­­

    #Claviers_invités #Internet_et_société #Libr'en_Vrac #Libre_Veille #Non_classé #GAFAM #Internet #Revue_de_web #Revue_hebdo #Surveillance #veille #webrevue

  • How a Wikipedia volunteer editor became a very vocal Web3 critic
    https://www.fastcompany.com/90733574/how-a-wikipedia-engineer-became-one-of-the-loudest-web3-skeptics

    BY MARK SULLIVAN8 MINUTE READ
    A new blockchain-based internet that abhors huge tech platforms, embraces digital currencies, and lets individuals control their data and identity sounds like a lovely idea. But a growing chorus of skeptics are saying that Web3–the term used to sum up these concepts–is at best highly aspirational and at worst a flat-out scam.

    Some of these critics express their doubts on Substack, or in YouTube rants, or on company blogs. Others voice their skepticism with their wallets, shorting cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Eth. Molly White, a software engineer and volunteer Wikipedia editor, has a simpler approach, and it’s a good one.

    White has emerged as one of Web3’s sharpest critics by simply compiling Web3’s day-to-day mishaps and ripoffs–its non-theoretical real-world consequences–at Web3 Is Going Great, a website (and Twitter account) she created and curates. The steady stream of these news stories (many of which aren’t covered in mainstream media) strongly suggests that Web3, in fact, isn’t going as great as its legions of cheerleaders would have you believe.

    I spoke with White via email about her views on Web3 fixtures such as DAOs (distributed autonomous organizations), cryptocurrencies, and NFTs (non-fungible tokens). Our conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity. (Disclosure: I own a modest amount of Bitcoin, mainly for research purposes.)

    Why were you compelled to start the Web3 Is Going Great? What were you seeing at the time?

    Although cryptocurrencies and blockchains have been around for a long time now, last year this “web3” shift really seemed to take off: this idea that blockchains will be the “future of the web.” People pushing this were saying that before long, everyone would use crypto, many services would be built on top of some blockchain or another, and all web interactions would be financialized in some way—all things that sound like a pretty terrible “future of the web” to me. Last year also felt like the year when the scamminess of the crypto space truly exploded, and also the year where the people behind a lot of these projects really set their sights on the average layperson (rather than the computer geek or the speculative investor) as their target audience. Everyday people were being told that they should put their money into crypto in one form or another, and I was beginning to see a lot of projects that to me seemed to be targeting the particularly vulnerable: totally unregulated apps encouraging people to take out sketchy loans to get out of a financial pinch, or projects promising to help people “invest” their retirement money into crypto, for example.

    As I began learning about the topic a little more, I also began coming across just scam (https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/president-sham-united-nations-affiliate-convicted-cryptocurrency-scheme) after scam (https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-tells-regulators-it-will-cease-operations-in-ontario-for-real) after scam (https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-tells-regulators-it-will-cease-operations-in-ontario-for-real), and hack (https://cointelegraph.com/news/espn-s-baseball-reporter-s-twitter-account-hacked-by-nft-scammers) after hack (https://floridapolitics.com/archives/509932-hackers-hijack-nikki-fried-campaign-twitter-account) after hack (https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/138250/hacker-steals-790000-of-nfts-and-crypto-from-owners-of-rare-bears). It seemed like every day a huge project was being hacked, or someone was launching something and making off with all the money, or people were getting their crypto wallets compromised through some technique or another. But the stories were all very fleeting—I would see them on Twitter or in a brief news headline, and then the social media/news attention span would move along and it was like it never even happened. I realized it could be really informative and meaningful to gather all of these disasters in one place, to both show how unfit this technology is for practically all use cases, and to show just how much people are getting scammed (https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2021/05/ftc-data-shows-huge-spike-cryptocurrency-investment-scams) when they try to dip their toes in.

    Why do you think we’re seeing such shocking amounts of scams around cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and the like? What is it about these models that make it such fertile ground for scammers?

    It’s enormously unregulated, and the regulations that should apply have been slow to be enforced. People seem to have this opinion that, because a cryptocurrency is involved, they can do anything they want: operate a Ponzi scheme, or sell unregistered securities. To some extent, they have been able to do anything they want, even the blatantly illegal stuff, because the regulatory enforcement has been so slow. But I also think we’re starting to see a change in that, and there are probably more than a few people behind various crypto projects who have been seeing enforcement actions by the SEC and others on scams that were happening several years ago, and thinking “uh oh, that looks a lot like what I’ve been doing”.

    I think the amount of hype that’s being pumped into the space is contributing to the issue, too. It’s coming from everywhere—the media, big-name celebrities, advertisements on mainstream TV networks, and of course social media. There’s a reason that get-rich-quick schemes are so enticing, and because it tends to be the success stories that get the attention, I think people start to believe that it’s actually common for people to make money from these things. It’s also a bit of a perfect storm with economic uncertainty facing fairly young people (who by far seem to be the ones being pulled into these scams): They’re more likely to have the types of jobs that were impacted particularly severely by the pandemic, and many of them are facing enormous debts from things like student loans.

    Has your opinion NFTs, crypto, and other blockchain models evolved at all since you started W3IGG?

    If anything, I probably have an even stronger opinion that these technologies are enabling a lot of harm, with few promising use cases or upsides. I’ve spent the last couple of months pretty immersed in this stuff—both learning about a ton of specific Web3 projects just to be able to cover them in the site, but also researching the underlying technologies and problems they’re trying to solve, as well as speaking with a lot of other experts on the subject and hearing their opinions.

    It seems like a lot of VCs are very excited about the blockchain and crypto. Do you have any thoughts about why this might be?

    VCs are excited about blockchains and cryptocurrencies for the same reason VCs are excited about anything: It’s a moneymaking opportunity. People are putting a lot of money into crypto, and despite all the ideological talk about how crypto might democratize wealth or remove such outsized amounts of it from the hands of a few big players (including some of the same enormous venture capital firms investing in crypto), that’s not actually what’s happening. The wealth is even more centralized in crypto, in many ways, and the space is beautifully designed for that to continue.

    Crypto also promises the opportunity of quicker returns than a lot of their more traditional investments—if a VC firm’s share in a project is represented in crypto, they can cash out anytime, rather than having to wait for a company to IPO.

    What is your impression of DAOs?

    My overwhelming impression is that most of the projects calling themselves DAOs are neither distributed nor autonomous, and the ones that are trying to be have been organized by people who have done a lot of thinking about how such an organization might work in theory, but have little practical experience with those kinds of organizations.

    In some of the reporting I’ve done about DAOs, I got the impression that it’s not always practical or possible to create something that’s totally decentralized and democratic.

    If you take a look at a lot of the groups calling themselves “DAOs”, you’ll see that they are often just one person or group of people controlling the project. Some of them ostensibly have governance tokens and community votes on proposals for the project, but we’ve seen more than one instance where a community has voted for one thing and the leaders of the so-called decentralized project have just decided to do something else. In other cases, there is not even a nominal attempt at having any sort of community governance. Some of those projects say they have plans for community governance to be added later (usually after the money is raised, of course), but whether they actually follow through on those promises is anyone’s guess.

    Do you think people might eventually find a way to make DAOs functional and useful?

    There are lots of existing structures for decentralized governance that have existed in society for far, far longer than DAOs have been around. Look at co-ops, for example. You could even argue that shareholders of most public companies have rights similar to participants in DAOs. Outside of the business world there are all sorts of examples of decentralized, leaderless groups: the Wikimedia movement, for example, or also groups like Occupy Wall Street or Alcoholics Anonymous. I personally find it unlikely that anyone with significant experience in any group like this would ever argue that the goals or mechanisms of these groups could be fully, reasonably represented in code.

    DAOs are, I think, one of the best illustrations of the problem with a lot of these Web3 projects: They are trying to find technological solutions that will somehow codify very complex social structures. A lot of them also seem to operate under the assumption that everyone is acting in good faith, and that project members’ interests will generally align—a baffling assumption given the amount of bad actors in the crypto space.

    I think a lot of people are trying to understand if there are real, practical use cases for Web3 models like NFTs and DAOs that will emerge after all the initial hype and hucksterism fade away. What do you think? Is there a “there” there?

    No, there isn’t.

    NFTs and DAOs are both great examples of solutions desperately in search of a problem. People have tried to come up with ideas for how NFTs might be useful if the interest in them as a speculative investment fades, and the ideas seem incredibly uncompelling—using them for things like event tickets, which are already being bought and sold quite adequately on existing systems.

    I suspect that the hype and hucksterism will fade away when regulators step in, and make it a lot harder for influencers to pump and dump tokens without disclosing their financial interests, or for people to promise impossible returns on what are clearly Ponzi schemes, or for people to sell what are pretty obviously unregistered securities. But when that aspect is taken away, so is much of the incentive to use the technology in the first place. You’re just left with a slow, expensive datastore that doesn’t scale well, and some really complex hurdles to overcome around privacy and data ownership.

    #Web3 #NFT #Arnaque

  • Hello, CSS Cascade Layers - Ahmad Shadeed
    http://ishadeed.com/article/cascade-layers

    In this article, we’ll explore how #cascade_layers work, and how they will help us write #CSS with more confidence, along with use-cases and examples.

    In the layers panel, notice how each button lives in a layer. The order is per the @layer definition at the top.

    When the order of layers is changed, the components layer will override the variations one. As a result, the default button style will win.


    Enfin une explication claire de ce truc, ça y est, je peux dire que j’ai capté le bouzin ^^

  • Khrys’presso du lundi 21 mars 2022
    https://framablog.org/2022/03/21/khryspresso-du-lundi-21-mars-2022

    Comme chaque lundi, un coup d’œil dans le rétroviseur pour découvrir les informations que vous avez peut-être ratées la semaine dernière. Tous les liens listés ci-dessous sont a priori accessibles librement. Si ce n’est pas le cas, pensez à activer … Lire la suite­­

    #Claviers_invités #Internet_et_société #Libr'en_Vrac #Libre_Veille #Non_classé #GAFAM #Internet #Revue_de_web #Revue_hebdo #Surveillance #veille #webrevue

  • Khrys’presso du lundi 7 mars 2022
    https://framablog.org/2022/03/07/khryspresso-du-lundi-7-mars-2022

    Comme chaque lundi, un coup d’œil dans le rétroviseur pour découvrir les informations que vous avez peut-être ratées la semaine dernière. Tous les liens listés ci-dessous sont a priori accessibles librement. Si ce n’est pas le cas, pensez à activer … Lire la suite­­

    #Claviers_invités #Internet_et_société #Libr'en_Vrac #Libre_Veille #Non_classé #GAFAM #Internet #Revue_de_web #Revue_hebdo #Surveillance #veille #webrevue
    https://mamot.fr/system/media_attachments/files/107/903/309/852/877/311/original/b90d8c97bd9dd342.mp4

  • Khrys’presso du lundi 14 mars 2022
    https://framablog.org/2022/03/14/khryspresso-du-lundi-14-mars-2022

    Comme chaque lundi, un coup d’œil dans le rétroviseur pour découvrir les informations que vous avez peut-être ratées la semaine dernière. Tous les liens listés ci-dessous sont a priori accessibles librement. Si ce n’est pas le cas, pensez à activer … Lire la suite­­

    #Claviers_invités #Internet_et_société #Libr'en_Vrac #Libre_Veille #Non_classé #GAFAM #Internet #Revue_de_web #Revue_hebdo #Surveillance #veille #webrevue
    https://mamot.fr/system/media_attachments/files/107/933/606/110/037/101/original/4c698871da3bb96a.mp4

  • These women are shaping web3 and the metaverse
    https://www.fastcompany.com/90722634/women-web3-metaverse

    By Ruth Readerlong Read

    Talk about the collection of technologies and ideas known as Web3 often focuses on making up for the transgressions of Web 2.0 companies, which have centralized control over online experiences and mined our personal data for their own profit. Whether or not you think the future of the internet involves AR, VR, NFTs, DAOs, the multiverse, or some combination thereof, there is an immense amount of money flooding into those sectors from the usual suspects. But if the same companies and people who ran Web 2.0 are at the helm of Web3, how much can really change?

    At its core, Web3 is about paying creators for their work. Music, artwork, digital fashion—any kind of intellectual property— is turned into or somehow attached to NFTs, so that the work can be certified, tracked, and transacted on a public blockchain. This infrastructure allows creators to be paid directly for their work. In this grand vision, the new internet is decentralized, with no one entity controlling it.

    How that will function is still being worked out. And right now, many of the people showing the most excitement about Web3 are the tech bro types you probably envision. But there’s also a cadre of women taking up their pickaxes and heaving them into the fertile new internet. They’re creating incentives to draw more women to Web3, so they can have a say in the next web.

    One of the splashiest efforts is BFF, a community that is designed to teach women how to get in on the crypto boom. Only one month old, it is already 14,000 members strong. BFF is led by Brit Morin, a former Googler and the founder of women’s media brand Brit + Co. She cofounded this new community for the “crypto curious” with a list of 50-plus celebrities (Tyra Banks, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Mila Kunis), technologists, and entrepreneurs.
    advertisement

    Another group, launched in 2018, is Black Women in Crypto, which aims to welcome more black women into the crypto space. There are also women-focused NFT collections such as Boss Beauties, WomenRise, and Crypto Coven. Some of these concentrate on art pieces, but Crypto Coven is selling avatars for the metaverse, the persistent VR/AR experience that could sit on top of Web3. Increasingly, there is funding for women content creators. Last week, Randi Zuckerberg—an entrepreneur who got her start in tech working for her brother Mark’s company—launched an accelerator called Big Hug that aims to elevate female creators with funding and mentorship.

    The timing of these ventures is propitious. In November, art market research firm ArtTactic noted that only 16% of NFT sales were going to female artists (the stats for non-white women were even more dismal). On NiftyGateway, an NFT marketplace owned by the Winklevoss twins, less than 4% of the artworks come from artists in Africa, less than 2.5% comes from Latin America, and less than 1% comes from artists in the Near East, the report says.

    In the metaverse, we’re all world builders—now is your time to build.”

    Cathy Hackl
    On top of that, CEOs in charge of the biggest metaverse platforms so far—Fortnite, Roblox, Sandbox, Decentraland, and Meta—are all white men, though at least two of those companies have a woman in the role of COO. Discord, widely thought to be at the leading edge of social networking, also has a white man at the wheel; however the company has a female head of engineering, Prachi Gupta. In crypto, the landscape is even worse, with only 5% of crypto companies being led by women, according to a recent estimate. Meanwhile, global venture capitalists poured $25 billion into blockchain companies last year, according to CB Insights. Pitchbook reports venture capitalists have also been investing about $2.2 billion per year since 2018 in augmented and virtual reality.

    Much of the current effort to bring women onto futuristic internet platforms is as content creators, rather than engineers of the underlying technology. Web3 is in some ways like the early 1990 iteration of the web, free and open to whoever is willing to develop in it. The goal of these various efforts to attract women to these new platforms is to ensure they have the same opportunity to capitalize as men do. It’s becoming clear that in the next version of the online world, having technical skill may be less important than being able to attract a band of devotees.

    “I’m a big proponent of saying, in the metaverse we’re all world builders—now is your time to build,” says tech futurist Cathy Hackl. While giving women a chance to build out the next big internet space is undoubtedly important, there is a question as to whether this will necessarily lead to a safer and more inclusive internet for all. Much of that will depend on who controls the technology that content is built on top of.
    [Metajuku: courtesy of Everyrealm]
    The ultimate creator economy

    While men still dominate in the nascent metaverse, female creators in Web3 are already rising to the top. Krista Kim is one of the most notable, for selling her digital Mars House for half a million dollars. Natalie Johnson, who spent much of her early career as a fashion buyer, is now building out a digital fashion house called Neuno. Everyrealm, a metaverse company with a majority female leadership team, garnered attention for its million-dollar land grab in Decentraland (the company has since invested $4.2 million into nearly 800 land parcels in The Sandbox).

    Janine Yorio, cofounder and CEO of Everyrealm, has a background in private equity and in real estate. After selling her real estate investment app Compound to investment platform Republic, she started speculating on metaverse properties for fun. This gambit quickly became the foundation of Everyrealm, her metaverse investment company. She says one of the most important things to understand about developing in the metaverse and making NFTs is that these products need communities.

    [Everyrealm executives from left to right: CEO Janine Yorio, CCO Jacqueline Schmidt, Metaverse and NFT lead Julia Schwartz, CMO Katie Witkin, courtesy of Everyrealm]
    “Crypto and the metaverse are so community-focused that you can build the coolest project ever, but if you don’t have a community and if you don’t know how to market it, then it’s worthless,” says Julia Schwartz, cofounder of Everyrealm who leads metaverse and NFT development.

    “A lot of the work that we do … involves the community and the storytelling,” adds Jacqueline Schmidt, Everyrealm’s creative director. Schmidt spent much of her previous career in design and real estate. Now she’s translating that skill into world-building.

    “It’s almost like if you were selling condos on spec: there’s an artist rendering and people are like, okay, I’ll take the penthouse. But then they put their deposit down and every month they’re like, okay, where is it? What’s happening? And so you have to show them mood boards and storyboards and bring them along for the ride— there are a lot of similarities to real world real estate development in that sense.”

    [Jonathan Simkhai Metaverse Fashion Week Show: credit Everyrealm, Blueberry, Jonathan Simkha]
    Because the metaverse and NFTs are so community-based, many women feel that they have a certain edge over men. “A woman-driven community is definitely a little more chill, a little more supportive,” says serial entrepreneur Gizem Mishi McDuff. “There are good vibes there and then there’s a lot less toxicity, because we care about that so much and that allows for the community to grow a lot faster in a better way.” The beauty of NFTs and a universally accepted blockchain, she argues, is that if a given community no longer suits you, you pick up your digital property and take it to a new one. You’re not chained to any one platform.

    McDuff owns a digital fashion company called Blueberry and says she came to virtual worlds almost by accident a decade ago. “There was this musical artist called Skye Galaxy and he did his concerts on Second Life,” she says. “So I ended up downloading Second Life and joining his shows just to see his concerts and I’ve been obsessed ever since.” Pivotally, she met a really cute guy at one of the shows. “The next time I saw him, I wanted my avatar to look cool. So I went shopping a little bit and I installed Photoshop and I made myself a cute little dress and it worked. He’s my husband now.”

    This experience was the spark for Blueberry, which designs clothes for Second Life and has 20 million digital assets. More recently, her company put on a runway show in Second Life for Jonathan Simkhai during New York Fashion Week.

    One thing McDuff worries about is how the platforms within the metaverse will be run as the ecosystem grows up. “There are a couple of things that are going on that will blow up in our face,” she says. These include how metaverse platforms compensate creators. Roblox, for example, only gives developers on its platform a quarter of every dollar spent, retaining a 75% cut on their creations.

    “When there is such a high tax on the content you create, it is not as motivating, so the quality of the content is a little less or the innovation is a little less,” she says. McDuff also believes that the fact that Roblox is profiting from the labor of kids will lead to regulation that slows down the development of the metaverse. “Kids are making this company a ton of money,” she says. (The company reported $1.9 billion in revenue in 2021.)
    The unlikelihood of a decentralized web

    The kids who are developing in Roblox also can’t take what they built with them. Which brings me back to the original question: A diversity of people, including more women, may be developing content and communities on top of Web3 and the metaverse, but does it matter if don’t they own the underlying platforms themselves?

    “A platform is only as strong as its infrastructure; if the infrastructure is designed in a biased or non-inclusive way, the ripple effects of that are profound,” says Danah Boyd, a Microsoft researcher and the founder of Data & Society, via email. She’s speaking about technology generally, though this rational could apply to Web3 or the metaverse.

    Platform owners wield immense control. Reddit allowed hate speech to flourish on its platform, because its executives prioritized a free speech policy. For years, Facebook allowed misinformation to spread freely to its users. When Twitter was first designed, its originators were not thinking about the potential for harassment and it took the company 15 years to create features to combat toxic behavior on its platform. (Safety Mode is still in beta.) Community moderators play important role in keeping communities safe, but they are ultimately limited or supported by the larger rules of the platforms.

    You don’t own “web3.”

    The VCs and their LPs do. It will never escape their incentives. It’s ultimately a centralized entity with a different label.

    Know what you’re getting into…

    — jack⚡️ (@jack) December 21, 2021

    Twitter cofounder and recently-departed CEO Jack Dorsey recently got in trouble with venture capitalist Marc Andreessen for suggesting that Web3 will not be as decentralized as promised. Dorsey tweeted that venture capitalists, who funded the companies that came to own Web 2.0, will also control Web3. He also posits that the web of the future is far more likely to be centralized than decentralized.

    Currently, many of the companies working on the next version of the web are building on top of Ethereum, a decentralized blockchain initially created by Canadian programmer Vitaly Dmitriyevich Buterin. While there is a lot of debate about whether Ethereum is truly decentralized, the bigger question is whether big tech companies will develop on a decentralized blockchain. More likely, they’ll create their own blockchain and try and incentivize developers to build on top of it.

    There’s a bit of conflict right now between kind of the complete utopian decentralization and the centralized web.”

    Randi Zuckerberg
    Meta (née Facebook) has tried to get its own blockchain going (to no avail). Gaming companies already have their own world specific economies, though players can’t take any of the stuff they build or buy off the platforms. So far, Dorsey’s other company, which rebranded from Square to Block (yes as in Blockchain), is the only outfit working on a blockchain it doesn’t own, by working on decentralized finance apps built on Bitcoin. Even if Ethereum does win out, big tech could still find a way to control it. Amazon’s AWS already runs 25% of Ethereum workloads, giving it outsized impact on the platform.

    “I agree that there’s a bit of conflict right now between kind of the complete utopian decentralization and the centralized web,” says Randi Zuckerberg. “I don’t think either of those extremes are correct, but I think we’re going to have to figure out where we net out in the middle of complete decentralization and complete centralization.” She notes that being in crypto right now doesn’t feel safe. “You’ve got to have your own back or you’re going to get scammed,” she says. While she doesn’t know exactly how centralization will come into play, she thinks it’s necessary for there to be accountability on the platform.

    Zuckerberg says it absolutely matters who is building the underlying technology in Web3 as well as the virtual reality platforms that make up the metaverse. “If you go into Discord communities, I think there is a super strong and immediate difference that you sense in a Discord community where the project has even one woman on the team versus projects that are all crypto bros,” she says. “There’s an immediate difference in what the discussion is like, what they’ll tolerate in those communities, and the mission, the goals and the ethos.”

    However the next version of the internet shapes up, it is perhaps promising that more women are deciding what companies get funded. In addition to Randi Zuckerberg, Beryl Li, cofounder of Yield Guild Games, is investing in play-to-earn game companies. At venture capital firm a16z, Arianna Simpson is leading investments in crypto and Web3 (one investment she was involved with is in a woman led company called Iron Fish, which is developing a privacy layer for blockchains). Projects like BFF create even more ways for women to play around with this burgeoning technology.

    “In this new era we’re very empowered,” says Hackl of herself and other women. In the last year she’s been invited to invest in several companies: “I’ve never seen myself as an investor, but now I do.”
    About the author

    Ruth Reader is a writer for Fast Company. She covers the intersection of health and technology.

    #Metaverse #Web3 #Blockchain #Féinisation #Genre #Infrastructure

  • Du Bois, et du jazz
    https://pan-african-music.com/du-bois-et-du-jazz

    Né le 23 février 1868, juste après l’abolition de l’esclavage aux États-Unis, et mort au Ghana, Du Bois fut un penseur majeur de la condition noire et un des pères fondateurs du panafricanisme. Retour sur son parcours, et sur la manière dont sa pensée a infusé le jazz.

    #WEB_Du_Bois #musique #jazz #Histoire

  • Thoughts On #Markdown — Smashing Magazine
    https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2022/02/thoughts-on-markdown

    If you’re going for markdown, at least consider the following trade-offs:

    – Markdown is not great for the developer experience in modern stacks
    – Markdown is not great for editorial experience
    – Markdown is not great in block content age, and shouldn’t be forced into it. Block content needs to

    Article intéressant sur l’histoire de MD et de ses dérivés, leurs usage, etc. (avec une mention à propos des #block_content).

    • Today, I will argue that Markdown’s primary users are developers and people who are interested in code. It’s not a coincidence that Slack made the WYSIWYG the default input mode once their software was used by more people outside of technical departments. And the fact that this was a controversial decision, so much that they had to bring it back as an option, shows how deep the love for markdown is in the developer community. There wasn’t much celebration of Slack trying to make it easier and more accessible for everyone. And this is the crux of the matter.

      […]

      The portability of content has much more to do with how you structure that content in the first place. Take WordPress, it’s fully open-source, you can host your own DB. It even has a standardized export format in XML. But anyone who has tried to move out of a mature WordPress install knows how little this helps if you’re trying to get away from WordPress.

      […]
      Ça on le dit depuis le début :

      Embedding specific presentation concerns in your content has increasingly become a liability and something that will get in the way of adapting, iterating, and moving quickly with your content. It locks it down in ways that are much more subtle than having content in a database. You risk ending up in the same place as moving out of a mature WordPress install with plugins. It is cumbersome to unmix structure and presentation.

      On retrouve https://github.com/portabletext/portabletext que j’avais déjà évoqué autour de SPIP il y a 3 ans :
      https://git.spip.net/spip/porte_plume/issues/3720#issuecomment-21130

      #web #développement #intégration #édition #contenu #rédaction #portabilité #interopérabilité #structured_data

  • https://aoc.media/analyse/2022/02/03/une-politique-du-meme

    Une politique du mème
    Par Albin Wagener
    Enseignant-chercheur en sciences du langage
    Ces derniers jours, l’image partagée sur Twitter d’un post-it mis en scène sur le bureau du président est ensuite devenue l’objet de nombreux « mèmes » sur les réseaux sociaux. On aurait bien tort de ne pas prendre au sérieux ces icônes issues de la culture underground, et de confiner les mèmes au simple domaine du numérique. Virales jusqu’à être mobilisées dans des manifestations, récupérées par des forces politiques d’extrême droite, ces productions graphiques polysémiques sont politiques par essence et bien loin d’être innocentes.

    Cela fait maintenant plusieurs années que les mèmes ont investi le champ numérique, devenant ainsi des objets incontournables de la culture web : des boards alternatifs (tels que 4chan ou Reddit) aux réseaux sociaux les plus majoritaires, ces petites vignettes qui combinent texte et image, souvent avec humour, sont devenues une manière d’exprimer un avis, de commenter l’actualité et même de marquer son engagement politique.
    C’est le propre de ces petits objets anodins que l’on confine souvent très injustement au simple domaine du numérique (ou du digital, sachant que les deux termes ne signifient pas exactement la même chose – contrairement à ce qu’un réflexe anglophobe commun tendrait à nous faire croire) : on estime qu’ils font partie d’une forme de mode, qu’ils ne sont là que pour signaler la circulation éphémère de traits d’humour potache, ou bien qu’ils sont d’abord l’apanage d’une culture des « jeunes » (sans que l’on sache très bien ce que cela signifie). Ce faisant, on a alors la tentation de ne pas prendre les mèmes au sérieux.

    Et bien on a tort, tout simplement. Prendre les mèmes à la légère, c’est ignorer le rôle qu’ils ont joué dans les motivations de l’auteur des attentats de Christchurch, en Nouvelle-Zélande, dont la consommation et la production de mèmes sur les forums d’extrême-droite ont été déterminantes pour son passage à l’acte. C’est également ignorer le fait que la figure de l’illustre « Pepe the Frog » a fini par être intégralement récupérée par l’alt-right conservatrice américaine, faisant de cette étrange grenouille verte l’emblème d’une communauté zélée de supporters trumpistes, particulièrement active dans ce qui deviendra par la suite l’assaut du Capitole.
    En outre, les mèmes ne sont pas un simple objet cantonné à l’espace numérique ; tout au contraire, ils sont postdigitaux par essence. Rappelons ici les travaux de Florian Cramer, qui précise la chose suivante : « en s’inspirant (…) du post-punk, du postcolonialisme et de Mad Max, le terme “post-digital”, dans son sens le plus facile à appréhender, décrit l’état de confusion des médias, des arts et du design après leur digitalisation[1] ». L’époque postdigitale dans laquelle nous vivons abolit, d’une certaine manière, les frontières entre ce qui se passe au sein des espaces numériques et ce qui se passe en-dehors, dynamitant ainsi les frontières artificielles entre « réel » et « virtuel », au profit d’une société qui se vit comme un nouvel ensemble de continuités complexes.
    Il en va de même pour les mèmes[2] : faciles à comprendre, à décoder et à ré-encoder pour de nouvelles utilisations, les mèmes deviennent des objets sociaux à part entière. Pour Limor Shifman, « dans cette ère hyper-mémétique, la circulation de copies et de dérivatifs par les utilisateurs constitue une logique prédominante (…). En ce sens, les copies deviennent plus importantes que ce qui est “original”[3] » ; en d’autres termes, c’est précisément parce que les mèmes font écho à cette nouvelle ère de reproductibilité et de légitimité de la copie, permise au départ par l’environnement participatif et collaboratif de ce que l’on appelle le web 2.0 (soit cette évolution d’internet permise par les réseaux sociaux et les encyclopédies collaboratives comme Wikipedia), que leur succès est considérable – une référence plus qu’évidente à la notion de folksonomie, développée entre autres par Olivier Le Deuff[4].
    Les mèmes participent à la réimplantation de la culture du web dans un espace qui le dépasse largement.
    Mais depuis quelques années, la dimension politique des mèmes a pris un nouveau tournant, puisque bon nombre de ces objets emblématiques ont fini par s’inviter sur les pancartes de manifestations diverses et variées, dans plusieurs pays du monde. À Hong-Kong, aux États-Unis, en Inde, en Allemagne, en Algérie ou en France, des manifestant.e.s de plusieurs pays se mettent à utiliser ces objets au sein d’événements bien réels, désormais également relayés et immortalisés au sein d’espaces numériques. Les mèmes participent ainsi à la réimplantation de la culture du web dans un espace qui le dépasse largement ; plus encore, ils deviennent l’emblème d’une véritable culture commune, puisqu’il est à noter que ces références fleurissent sur les pancartes de bon nombre de pays, lorsqu’il s’agit de porter des slogans et des idées dans des manifestations.
    Bref : depuis plusieurs années, la trajectoire des mèmes s’est très clairement éloignée de leur caractère confidentiel des débuts, cantonné à certains forums underground de connaisseurs, désireux de conserver jalousement le positionnement alternatif de ces drôles d’objets de communication. En réalité, les mèmes sont de redoutables vecteurs de transmission d’information – redoutables car très efficaces : en ce sens, ils reposent sur une dimension duale, au moins dans un prime abord. En effet, chaque mème de sorte à combiner à la fois un topème (soit un sujet sur lequel le mème porte un commentaire) et un référème (soit un contexte de culture populaire qui lui sert de support). Prenons un exemple : les créations mémétiques du compte « les Tintinades » ont précisément pour référème permanent l’univers de Tintin, mais font varier les topèmes au gré des envies ou de l’actualité.
    C’est précisément la force des mèmes : l’important n’est pas nécessairement les sujets qu’ils abordent, mais le fait qu’ils prennent appui sur des référèmes issus de la culture pop pour aborder ces sujets. Critiquer une mesure politique néolibérale en utilisant par exemple une image des Simpson peut s’avérer infiniment plus efficace ou viral que le commentaire d’un éditorialiste sur une chaîne d’information en continu ; bien évidemment, l’objet du mème ne sera pas de développer un argumentaire complexe, mais au contraire de le synthétiser dans une sorte de version .zip d’un discours particulier. Et c’est là l’autre particularité des mèmes – sa troisième dimension donc, si l’on peut dire, au-delà des dimensions de topème et de référème. En ce sens, le même est plus proche du signe peircien que du signe saussurien, pour reprendre cette distinction sémiotique.
    En d’autres termes, le mème n’est pas simplement un artefact communicationnel qui combine sujet de conversation et support culturel : il constitue une façon de transmettre des états mentaux et affectifs de manière relativement précise[5]. C’est plus particulièrement le cas des gifs, ces petites vidéos courtes, animées et répétitives, qui sont souvent utilisées dans des cas analogues aux mèmes (et qui en constituent pourtant une forme différente) : on y distingue souvent des personnages qui passent par des émotions différentes, avec des transitions fines, et l’expression d’états cognitifs ou mentaux qui permettent de s’identifier plus aisément au message transmis. Dans cette optique, les mèmes représentent souvent des morceaux (ou chunks) d’humanité : on peut y figurer la surprise, la déception, la colère, la tristesse ou encore l’incompréhension – là où un argumentaire purement langagier demanderait des précisions lexicales que le mème parvient souvent à transcender.
    Ce n’est pas simplement l’utilisation des mèmes dans le champ politique qui les transforme en objets politiques ; ils sont politiques par essence.
    Les mèmes permettent donc d’exprimer beaucoup de choses : il est non seulement possible de les utiliser pour produire un commentaire politique ou une critique sur l’état du monde ou de la société, mais également de transmettre l’exacte état affectif dans lequel on se trouve au moment où on produit cette critique ou ce commentaire. Cette nuance est de taille, et hisse le mème au rang des productions langagières qui produisent une communication d’une toute nouvelle forme, capable non seulement de transmettre un message, mais également de partager une émotion, tout en cimentant des communautés qui partagent les mêmes références culturelles. À ce titre, il est d’ailleurs important de revenir sur cette notion de référème.
    En effet, énormément de mèmes et de gifs mettent en lumière des scènes issues de films, de séries ou de dessins animés majoritairement issus de studios de production massivement nord-américains : qu’il s’agisse de Parks & Recreation, des franchises Marvel ou encore de BoJack Horseman, c’est l’ensemble du panthéon audio-visuel et du soft power culturel états-unien qui se retrouve très souvent mobilisé dans ces mèmes.
    Cette réalité n’a rien d’anecdotique, tout au contraire : à partir du moment où l’on sait que la manifestation des émotions et des états affectifs est culturelle, et que les manifestations proposées dans les mèmes sont jouées par des comédien.ne.s, on est en droit de se demander dans quelle mesure le mème ne participe pas, involontairement ou non (tout comme celles et ceux qui les créent et les transmettent) à la diffusion d’une hégémonie culturelle particulièrement pernicieuse, puisqu’elle s’appuie à la fois sur l’humour et la convivialité des références partagées pour s’inscrire dans le paysage médiatique et démocratique.
    En tant que nouveaux objets langagiers, les mèmes ont de multiples atouts qui les rendent particulièrement adaptés aux évolutions de nos sociétés, et qui permettent l’expression de messages complexes, sous des atours apparemment anodins. Mais comme tout objet langagier, les mèmes ne sont pas innocents : situés dans des pratiques à la fois permises par des affordances techniques et enracinées dans une culture numérique collaborative, ils constituent également des artefacts culturels qui installent et modifient nos références en matière de culture populaire, tout en alimentant les représentations sociales en matière d’expression des états affectifs et mentaux.
    En ce sens, ce n’est pas simplement l’utilisation des mèmes dans le champ politique qui les transforme en objets politiques ; ils sont politiques par essence, dans leur tridimensionnalité, leur contexte d’utilisation et les conditions de leur viralité. Reflets de l’époque qui les a enfantés, les mèmes sont également les précurseurs d’une époque à venir, qui permet de fusionner des éléments complexes au sein de frontières floues, où se jouent luttent d’influence, batailles sociales et guerres politiques.
     
    NDLR : Albin Wagener publiera en avril 2022 aux Éditions de l’université Grenoble-Alpes Mémologie. Théorie postdigitale des mèmes.
    Albin Wagener
    [1] Florian Cramer, « What is “post-digital” ? » dans David M. Berry et Michael Dieter, Postdigital aesthetics : art, computation and design, Palgrave MacMillan, 2015, p. 12-26

    [2] Consulter à ce titre l’encyclopédie mémétique en ligne KnowYourMeme : https://knowyourmeme.com.

    [3] Limor Shifman, « Memes in a digital world : Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker », Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 2013, pp. 362–377

    [4] Olivier Le Deuff, « Folksonomies : les usagers indexent le web », Bulletin des bibliothèques de France, 51 (4), 2006, pp. 66-70 https://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/bbf-2006-04-0066-002

    [5] Voir Albin Wagener, « Mèmes, gifs et communication cognitivo-affective sur Internet. L’émergence d’un nouveau langage humain », Communication, 37(1), 2020 https://journals.openedition.org/communication/11061

    #mème #langage #production_langagière_politique #détournement #web2.0 #virtualité #viralité #postdigital

  • ☑️ Quels sont les nouveaux types DNS pour davantage d’informations pour les logiciels client ?

    ➡️ La réponse avec notre expert Stéphane Bortzmeyer https://www.afnic.fr/observatoire-ressources/papier-expert/de-nouveaux-types-dns-pour-davantage-dinformations-pour-les-logiciels-client

    –---------------------------------

    ☑️ What are the new DNS record types to give more information for client applications ?

    ➡️ The answer with our expert Stéphane Bortzmeyer https://www.afnic.fr/en/observatory-and-resources/expert-papers/new-dns-record-types-to-give-more-information-for-client-applications

    #Afnic #SVCB #HTTPS #Internet #Web #DNS

  • Welcome to ‘Web3.’ What’s That ? - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/05/business/dealbook/what-is-web3.html

    If that sounds far-fetched, consider that venture capitalists have invested more than $27 billion in crypto and related projects this year, more than the previous 10 years combined, according to PitchBook. The biggest investors and industry players are also lobbying in Washington to influence rules that would favor their futuristic view of tokenomics, which can already be seen in some burgeoning communities where web3 is not some abstract concept but a feature of daily life.

    So far in 2021, about $27 billion worth of crypto has been spent on major NFT platforms, according to Chainalysis. That’s up from $114 million in all of last year.

    What are people getting? The NFT confers public proof of ownership and authenticity of an item, which may or may not include copyright — just as in the physical world an artist may sell a work but retain the intellectual property, said Frank Gerratana of Mintz, a law firm.

    Last month, Miramax sued the director Quentin Tarantino over his proposed auction of “Pulp Fiction” NFTs, which were linked to high-resolution scans from his original handwritten script. The company said using the film’s branding and imagery violated its rights.

    Another web3 concept that challenges conventions is decentralized social media, where users earn and trade crypto.

    On DeSo, a network for blockchain-based apps, users are paid for popularity, participation, posts and work. Its founder, Nader Al-Naji, a former Google engineer, believes that internet users will want to bypass the likes of Twitter and TikTok, which make money by serving them ads, and capture this worth directly for themselves instead.

    Toujours les mêmes arguments d’aide aux petits qui se sont toujours révélés faux !!

    Any users can be rewarded for their musings, music or mere presence via tokens or “frictionless tipping,” with a diamond button that allows others to send a bit of crypto their way in appreciation of whatever they do or say.

    “The vast majority of the benefits go to the smaller creators who people have always wanted to support,” Mr. Al-Naji said. “Here you just throw them some diamonds, you know, or buy their coin, which is an investment.”

    #Web3 #Cryptomonnaies

  • Jack Dorsey and Marc Andreessen’s Crypto Feud Puts Web3 at Risk - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/18/business/dealbook/web3-venture-capital-andreessen.html?campaign_id=2&emc=edit_th_20220123&ins

    “You don’t own ‘web3.’ The VCs and their LPs do.”

    Jack Dorsey tweeted this esoteric salvo in late December, not long after he stepped down as the head of Twitter to focus on advancing his Bitcoin ambitions. The post, swiping at the power held by venture capitalists and their limited partners as they try to reorganize the internet around blockchain technology, an effort known as web3, soon set off a public feud among members of the Silicon Valley ruling class. The dispute over what many herald as the next arena of technological revolution has drawn increasingly hard lines. Elon Musk is with Mr. Dorsey; Marc Andreessen is his enemy.

    The web3 revolution, backers say, promises the democratization of commerce and information by building a better internet on blockchain networks — distributed ledger systems that form the basis of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. It theoretically would cut out traditional middlemen and gatekeepers, letting users transact directly and have a greater stake in the programs they use.

    But Mr. Dorsey has a different view. “It will never escape their incentives,” continued his post about the role of venture capitalists in web3. “It’s ultimately a centralized entity with a different label.”

    Tokenisation de l’internet

    Essentially, web3 refers to an internet operating on so-called tokenomics. Tokens are digital units of cryptocurrency, and in web3, developers and users have mutual financial interests and everyone can earn crypto. Users benefit directly from their contributions — creativity, play, engagement or deposits, say. They can also help govern futuristic community-run companies, where they can vote on decisions with tokens created by the particular project.

    Yet big investors also appear attracted to the infinite frontier. Last year, venture capitalists backed about 460 blockchain projects, spending nearly $12.75 billion, up from 155 deals worth $2.75 billion in 2020, per Pitchbook data provided to The New York Times. And the venture arms of crypto exchanges like Coinbase and FTX are some of the biggest deal makers, compounding concerns about corporate concentration. That means major players increasingly control the decentralized entities said to democratize everything for little guys.

    “While cryptocurrency industry insiders promote the ‘democratized’ benefits of digital assets,” Ms. Goldstein testified, “in truth, crypto concentrations of money and power match or surpass those in traditional financial markets.”

    Proponents across the web3 ideological divide have been working to woo lawmakers. Venture capitalists are pushing policy proposals meant to influence officials to embrace web3. Believers in the revolution, like Mr. Selkis of Messari, have compiled lists of politicians to support. But the movement still appears to lack a unified front.

    The debate that Mr. Dorsey sparked last month has continued online, though it appears he has begun to direct his attention elsewhere. On Thursday, he started a Bitcoin legal defense fund for developers who face “legal headaches,” and he said Block would get involved with mining Bitcoin.

    Andreessen Horowitz’s policy team has been looking beyond Washington, publishing proposals for global leaders on how to become “web3 republics.”

    Crypto, however, is not the only issue on every tech billionaire’s mind.

    #Web3 #Tokenisation #Internet #Capital_risque #Cryptomonnaies

  • Meta and Twitter’s NFT Landgrab Could Backfire | WIRED
    https://www.wired.com/story/nft-metaverse-facebook-twitter/?bxid=61d2146d06833d7e0c58d56a&cndid=67944061&esrc=profile-page&source=EDT_WI

    Whether you view Web3—the decentralized vision of the future of the internet—as a utopian idea or a Ponzi scheme, one thing is for certain: It’s meant to look different from what’s gone before.

    This is what makes the latest moves by Meta, parent company of Facebook and Instagram, and Twitter so strange. On January 20, Twitter rolled out the ability for users of its paid premium service, Twitter Blue, to change their profile picture to a non-fungible token (NFT) they own—a key part of Web3.

    On the same day, The Financial Times reported that Meta was working on integrating NFT ownership into their profiles on Facebook and Instagram. The company is also developing a tool to allow users to mint NFTs of their own on Meta platforms, according to reports. It follows public statements in December 2021 from Instagram chief Adam Mosseri that his app was exploring the promise of NFTs.

    The co-opting of NFTs by big tech platforms is, in some way, unsurprising. Web3 and NFTs have become hot commodities—the biggest player in the space, NFT marketplace OpenSea, raised $300 million in funding earlier this month, giving it a valuation of $13.3 billion. It makes sense that the biggest names on Web 2.0 would want to capitalize on the trend and stay relevant.

    Unfortunately, Meta and Twitter’s plan to sanitize NFTs goes directly against the principle by which they were created. Both companies favor key practices that Web3 supporters want to do away with—centralized control of key digital services by a handful of multibillion-dollar corporations. Both make inordinate amounts of money from the things that Web3’s biggest boosters want to remove.

    And for the Silicon Valley titans, the backing of a market full of scammers and fraudsters is an odd move.

    “At the moment it’s the wild west—there’s nobody to police this,” says Alan Woodward, professor of cybersecurity at the University of Surrey. “The problem is these social media companies become responsible. They become policemen.” That’s particularly worrisome given the sheer volume of copyright and ownership disputes that have blighted NFT artwork in recent months. “If there’s a dispute over those NFTs, who do those people go to?” asks Woodward. “It’ll be Facebook or Twitter. Why would you want to take that liability?”

    Already buffeted by regulators who want to curb their power, Twitter and Meta are among the internet companies caught in the middle of a polarized political debate over whether they are responsible for the propagation of violent and extreme content online, so giving any ammunition to their critics seems foolhardy. And yet they’re about to share the imprimatur of their implicit support to a technology that is famous for a rug pull that stole millions of dollars from victims, racism (lots of racism), and theft, as well as questionable ties to shady Russian crime gangs who are happy to fictionalize their nationality and gender to take money from rubes. Both Twitter and Facebook did not respond to a request for comment for this story.

    “Despite the positivity around NFT use cases, there’s a lot of distrust in the community—perhaps due to the anonymity of key artists and influencers, and almost certainly due to the scammers that circle like vultures and frequent rug pulls,” says PJ Cooper, founder of Pandimensional Trading Co., which is launching its own NFT collection later this year. Despite those reservations, Cooper is largely supportive of Twitter’s entry into the NFT space, and says he will display an NFT as his profile picture when functionality rolls out to the UK.

    Cooper does, however, have worries about the fact that people can still right-click and save NFT profile pictures and mint their own version of them as NFTs.

    A company spokesperson for NFT marketplace OpenSea, Allie Mack, confirmed that NFT profile pictures that appear on Twitter are verified through the company’s site. In fact, Twitter uses API, metadata, and collection information from OpenSea to authenticate an NFT displayed on a user’s profile and turns it into a “soft hexagon” on the site. Around the same time as Twitter launched NFTs, OpenSea crashed. At the time, security researcher Jane Manchun Wong tweeted that OpenSea’s platform had taken out Twitter’s NFT feature. OpenSea says that the outage had “absolutely zero impact on the public Twitter integration” and that the issue flagged by Jane happened in a closed beta. Since the Twitter integration launch, Mack says there has been zero interruption to the Twitter service.

    Others are not convinced that relying on a third party site is the right decision. “OpenSea is pretty unreliable,” says Patrick McCorry, senior system engineer at blockchain startup Infura. This may be one thing Big Tech wants to fix before embracing NFTs full bore, he says.

    The OpenSea platform itself has not been free of controversy. Artists have pointed out that the site is rife with rip-off NFT versions of their real-life art, or versions of their sculptures and paintings that could easily be purchased by unwitting social media users. The problem got so big that DeviantArt, an art hosting website from which works were repeatedly lifted, developed its own tool to scan the blockchain for works that also appear on its site, and inform the creators. The platform does have procedures for those whose art has been stolen to appeal for work to be taken down, but the problem persists. A recent investigation found profiles selling NFTs of trademarked logos from some of the world’s biggest brands, including Microsoft, Disney, Amazon, and Adidas, without permission.

    Theft is a perennial problem for the NFT world, and one that seems unlikely to be easily fixed, but McCorry thinks that’s a non-issue for Meta and Twitter. “What matters really is custody and the ability to sell it on a secondary market,” he says. For now, it is clear that neither company would own or have custody of an NFT. “Custody is a liability for them,” he said.

    For those deep in the NFT space, the adoption of official standards by Twitter in particular is welcomed. Plenty of Twitter users have NFT art as their profile picture, but find it difficult to prove ownership, particularly when faced by trolls who like nothing more than to right-click and steal their NFTs to show them the fallibility of their investments. “Right now, anyone can just put up a CryptoPunk picture and pretend to have one,” says McCorry. Twitter’s plans to prove ownership officially are “a nice way to demonstrate digital property rights.”

    It’s easy to see why Twitter and Meta want to get involved in the NFT space—Woodward says it’s a land grab that, in the case of Meta, gives it ownership of one of the key technologies that could be involved in constructing its own version of the metaverse. For Twitter, it’s a way to build credibility around a forward-thinking tech community. “But there’s a point when the rubber hits the road, and there could be real commercial disputes about it,” says Woodward.

    The legitimacy that Big Tech lends the NFT experiment is a major benefit for boosters of the technology. But it could also be the thing that signals the beginning of the end for it in the long run. “One of the things about NFTs is that you and I can agree to exchange wherever we like,” says Woodward. “But if you get a corporate involved, isn’t it all becoming a bit Big Tech and commercial?”

    Behind this decision is an assumption that users on all three social media sites want to be involved in buying, selling, and displaying NFTs. But none have provided evidence to back up this assumption. Once the functions on these sites are rolled out, this will be the first time that the general public will be exposed and encouraged to join a digital token market that, until now, may have been perceived as obscure and niche. Zoomers on Facebook could suddenly join the once-nerdy ranks of OpenSea users and bid real money to buy digitally minted pictures of a monkey, or whatever else takes their fancy. And they may not want to at all.

    Woodward cautions overexuberant members of the NFT community from being too jubilant. “I don’t think anyone fully understands what the true potential or implications of NFTs are,” he says. “But I think there’s a bundle of bollocks being talked about it. I’m not sure people have got their thinking all aligned on this yet. I suspect it’s very much a case of the big tech companies wanting to jump on the bandwagon—because it is a fairly fast-moving bandwagon.” What might the big social media giants do when they’re in charge of the bandwagon? Woodward has one theory. “I think it’s just another way of acquiring and keeping users.”

    #NFT #Web3 #Meta #Twitter #Profile